Law ยท Rules
Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014
The rules under the Companies Act, 2013 that govern how a board meets and which decisions only a board may take. They deal with attendance by video conferencing, the matters reserved to the board and the committees that assist it.
- Kind
- Rules
- Year
- 2014
- Administered by
- Ministry of Corporate Affairs
- Law stated as at
What it does
These rules fill in the Companies Act, 2013 on the working of the board. The Act says a board must meet, must act by resolution at a meeting for certain decisions, and may appoint committees. The rules supply the mechanics: how a director may take part without being in the room, which matters may not be taken up by a meeting held through video conferencing, which powers the board may exercise only at a meeting, and how the committees that the Act requires of certain companies are to be made up.
The Act itself fixes the rhythm. A board meets at least four times a year, with no more than 120 days between two meetings. The rules do not alter that rhythm. They deal with what happens inside it.
Who it binds
The rules bind companies incorporated under the Act and their directors, with particular provisions applying to classes of company, such as listed companies and public companies of a stated size, that must have an audit committee or a nomination and remuneration committee. Directors are bound in a personal sense as well: a decision that the Act and the rules reserve to a board meeting is not validly taken by a director, a managing director or a committee acting alone, unless the rules provide a delegation.
What has changed, and when
- The rules were made under the Companies Act, 2013 in 2014 and have been amended more than once since. Those amendments have changed, among other things, the treatment of video conferencing and the delegation of powers.
- The site's related instruments include the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Amendment Rules, 2025, which bear on the board's role in restructuring, though they sit under a different Chapter of the Act.
- A reader relying on an older judgment or a printed copy of the rules should check which version applied on the date of the meeting in question.
What turns on it in practice
The recurring issue is the line between a decision the board must take and one that management may take. Section 179 of the Act, with the rules, lists powers the board exercises only by a resolution passed at a meeting, including raising money by issuing securities, borrowing, investing funds, granting loans or giving guarantees, and approving certain financial statements and mergers. A transaction that crosses the line without a proper board resolution is open to challenge as being outside the authority of the person who signed it, and a counterparty that relied on the signature may find that the company says so.
The second issue is the record. A resolution is only as good as the meeting that produced it, so the notice, the quorum, the attendance, the manner of participation and the minutes all become evidence. The rules name matters that are not to be taken up at a meeting held through video conferencing, subject to the relaxations in force at the time, so the minutes of such a meeting should show which rule version was relied on.
The third is delegation. A board may delegate some powers, and the rules set the limits. Where a company's policy lets a committee or an officer approve loans or guarantees up to a threshold, the delegation should be recorded by board resolution and kept current, and the amount of any loan or guarantee measured against the limits in the Act.
The site's boardroom and corporate practice area works with these rules in board calendars, resolution registers, delegation matrices and the minutes that make a decision defensible.
Reference
Practice areas that work under it
Standing legal advisory to boards and promoters on governance, contract oversight, regulatory compliance and outsourced in-house legal support.
