Skip to content
Juris Eagle crestJuris EagleAdvisoryArbitrationLitigation

Law ยท Statute

The Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996

The Act that lets the State levy and collect a cess on the cost of building and construction work. The money funds the welfare boards that look after construction workers.

Kind
Act
Year
1996
Law stated as at

What it does

The Act provides for the levy and collection of a cess on the cost of construction incurred by employers, for the purpose of financing the welfare of building and other construction workers. It is a companion to the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996, which sets the conditions on the site. The regulating Act says how workers are to be treated, and this Act supplies the money for the welfare boards that provide benefits to them.

The cess is charged on the cost of construction. The Act fixes a range for the rate, with an upper limit of two per cent and a lower limit of one per cent, and the Central Government notifies the rate within it. It is collected and then transferred to the welfare board of the State concerned, which applies it to the schemes the board runs for registered workers.

The Act also provides for assessment of the cess, for payment by the employer, for interest on delay and for penalty where the cess is not paid or is understated. An order of assessment can be appealed, and the Act sets the route.

Who it binds

The employer who carries out building or other construction work, which includes a developer, a contractor who is the employer of the workers, and a government department or public body that builds directly. The cess is a charge on the employer, not on the worker. The welfare board is the body entitled to the proceeds, and the officers appointed under the Act assess and collect them.

A person who builds a private house for personal use is treated differently under the Act's own exclusion, which is why the first question in any matter is whether the work and the employer fall within the definitions at all.

What has changed, and when

The regulating Act of 1996 was brought into the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020, which was enacted to subsume it. The effect of the Code on this cess Act, and the date from which any part of the Code applies to a given site, are matters of commencement that decide which instrument governs a particular period. This page describes the cess Act as the law that levies the cess and does not state the commencement position of the Code, which is to be established from the notifications themselves.

What turns on it in practice

For a developer or a contractor, the cess is a cost that is easy to overlook until an assessment arrives. It is calculated on the cost of construction, so the question is how that cost is measured: whether land cost, architect fees and similar items are in or out, and when the cost is treated as incurred. A developer that has paid the cess on a project and has not kept the workings for it will find that the workings are what matter when the officer asks.

The second point is registration of the establishment. Both the regulating law and the cess depend on the work being an establishment of the kind the law describes, and the same facts that bring a project within one bring it within the other. An employer should expect the cess question to arise at the same time as the question whether workers are registered with the board.

The third is the time dimension. Cess is a recurring liability across the life of a project, and an old project may carry an unpaid cess from the years in which the law was less actively enforced. The firm's employment work names this Act among the instruments that apply to a construction employer, alongside the labour law of the establishment.

Reference

Notes that cite it

No published note cites this instrument yet.

Also named on