Skip to content
Juris Eagle crestJuris EagleAdvisoryArbitrationLitigation

Glossary

Commercial wisdom

The principle that the commercial judgement of the committee of creditors on a resolution plan belongs to the committee and is not open to judicial review.

Stated as at · Reviewed · All terms

Commercial wisdom is the phrase the courts use for the committee of creditors' judgement on whether a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is worth approving: its view of feasibility, value and distribution. The principle is that the adjudicating authority checks a plan against the Code but does not substitute its own view of the commercial bargain.

The principle survived a challenge in 2025. In Kalyani Transco v. Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd., the Supreme Court rejected an approved plan on 2 May 2025, recalled that judgment on review on 31 July 2025, and on rehearing, in 2025 INSC 1165, restored the settled position. In M/s Tata Steel Ltd. v. Varsha, decided on 17 July 2026, the Court carried the same logic to claims, holding that proceedings not crystallised into quantifiable claims by the date of approval stand extinguished. Our reading, as at 21 September 2026, is that this is a settled line.

Used in

Sources

  1. ActThe Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (No. 31 of 2016), as consolidated by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of Indiaibbi.gov.inOn this site: The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
  2. JudgmentM/s Tata Steel Ltd. v. Varsha (2026 INSC 717, 17 July 2026), Supreme Court of Indiaapi.sci.gov.in

Cite this termCommercial wisdom. Juris Eagle glossary. Stated as at 21 September 2026. https://juriseagle.com/glossary/commercial-wisdom